Rüdiger Mutz


2017

doi dblp
The effect of the "very important paper" (VIP) designation in Angewandte Chemie International Edition on citation impact: A propensity score matching analysis
Rüdiger Mutz | Tobias Wolbring | Hans-Dieter Daniel
2017 Volume 68 Issue 9

2015

doi dblp
How well does a university perform in comparison with its peers? The use of odds, and odds ratios, for the comparison of institutional citation impact using the Leiden Rankings
Lutz Bornmann | Rüdiger Mutz
2015 Volume 66 Issue 12

doi dblp
Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions: A multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex-ante and ex-post peer evaluation data from the Austrian science fund
Rüdiger Mutz | Lutz Bornmann | Hans-Dieter Daniel
2015 Volume 66 Issue 11

doi dblp
Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references
Lutz Bornmann | Rüdiger Mutz
2015 Volume 66 Issue 11

doi dblp
What is behind the curtain of the Leiden Ranking?
Rüdiger Mutz | Hans-Dieter Daniel
2015 Volume 66 Issue 9

2014

doi dblp
From P100 to P100': A new citation-rank approach
Lutz Bornmann | Rüdiger Mutz
2014 Volume 65 Issue 9

2013

doi dblp
Multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings: The Leiden ranking 2011/2012
Lutz Bornmann | Rüdiger Mutz | Hans-Dieter Daniel
2013 Volume 64 Issue 8

doi dblp
Do Universities or Research Institutions With a Specific Subject Profile Have an Advantage or a Disadvantage in Institutional Rankings? A Latent Class Analysis With Data From the SCImago Ranking
Lutz Bornmann | Félix de Moya Anegón | Rüdiger Mutz
2013 Volume 64 Issue 11

2011

doi dblp
Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents
Loet Leydesdorff | Lutz Bornmann | Rüdiger Mutz | Tobias Opthof
2011 Volume 62 Issue 7

2009

doi dblp
Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures?
Lutz Bornmann | Rüdiger Mutz | Hans-Dieter Daniel
2009 Volume 60 Issue 6

2008

doi dblp
Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine
Lutz Bornmann | Rüdiger Mutz | Hans-Dieter Daniel
2008 Volume 59 Issue 5